Smoking and Melanoma Outcomes—Another Reason to Quit

Menée à partir des données de deux essais portant sur 6 279 patients atteints d'un mélanome cutané de stade précoce (âge moyen : 52,7 ans ; hommes : 57,9 %), cette étude évalue l'association entre le statut tabagique et la survie des patients

JAMA Network Open, Volume 7, Numéro 2, Page e2354762-e2354762, 2024, éditorial en libre accès

Résumé en anglais

Do you need another reason to encourage your patients to stop smoking? Smoking increases the risk of a myriad of diseases and is associated with cancer incidence and mortality. Smoking increases the risk of dying of cancer of the lung, oropharynx, pancreas, bladder, and cervix, to name just a few. Jackson and colleagues found that a substantial proportion of patients (1077 of 6279 patients [17.2%]) who presented with clinically localized melanoma were current smokers. Perhaps this is an ideal moment to recommend against smoking because the diagnosis of melanoma, in my experience, has often been a teachable moment. Many patients dramatically alter their sun exposure habits, returning for follow-up visits without a trace of sunburn or tan (even in the summer months), despite a lack of evidence that modification of this behavior is associated with long-term outcomes for melanoma. While it is certainly not as addictive as nicotine, UV exposure shares features of addiction as well. Jackson and colleagues use the data from 2 large, well-conducted clinical trials in patients with clinically localized melanoma to determine the association of smoking with melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and melanoma-associated death (MAD). The Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials (MSLT-I and MSLT-II) provided the data and were conducted to determine whether sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy was associated with improved MSS compared with wide excision and observation (MSLT-I) and whether completion node dissection in patients with SLN-positive melanoma was associated with MSS advantage compared with nodal basin observation (MSLT-II). These 2 trials were practice-changing (neither study found an association) and provided the foundation for the current treatment of patients with clinically localized melanoma or microscopic regional nodal disease.