Surgical outcomes and morbidity in open and videoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer: a systematic review and metanalysis
A partir d'une revue systématique de la littérature publiée entre 2012 et 2022 (17 études), cette méta-analyse évalue les résultats d'une lymphadénectomie inguinale par voie ouverte ou endoscopique pour un cancer de la vulve
Résumé en anglais
Introduction: Surgical evaluation of inguinal lymph nodes is essential to correctly guide the adjuvant treatment of vulvar cancer patients. Open inguinal lymphadenectomy (OIL) approach is the preferred route, while the videoendoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) seems to be associated with better results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of OIL vs VEIL in vulvar cancer.
Methods: The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. The search string included the following keywords: “(vulvar cancer) AND ((inguinal) OR (femoral)) AND ((lymph node dissection) OR (lymphadenectomy))”. Three double-blind researchers independently extracted data.
Results: Seventeen studies were considered eligible for the analysis. Seven studies were included in the OIL group and ten studies in the VEIL group. A total of 372 groins were included in OIL group and 197 groins in VEIL group. 153 groins (41.1 %) in the OIL group and 25 groins (12.6 %) in the VEIL group developed major complications. The analysis of all lymphatic and wound complications showed that VEIL had a lower rate of lymphatic and wound complications. Estimated blood loss (p= 0.4), hospital stay (p= 0.18), time of drainage (p= 0.74), number of lymph node excised (p= 0.74) did not show significant difference between the two approaches.
Conclusions: VEIL route may be a valid alternative to OIL route with no differences in terms of surgical outcomes, except for operative time that is shorter for OIL. Future analysis of randomized controlled trials in this specific patient population are warranted to confirm these results.
