Re-irradiation plus pembrolizumab: Phase II study for recurrent glioblastoma patients

Mené sur 60 patients atteints d'un glioblastome récidivant, cet essai multicentrique de phase II évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue du taux de réponse globale et de la survie globale à 6 ou 12 mois, d'un traitement combinant seconde irradiation et pembrolizumab

Clinical Cancer Research, sous presse, 2024, résumé

Résumé en anglais

Purpose: Radiation therapy may enhance anti-tumor immune responses by several mechanisms including induction of immunogenic cell death. We performed a phase 2 study of pembrolizumab with re-irradiation in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Methods: Sixty recurrent glioblastoma patients received pembrolizumab with re-irradiation alone (cohort A, bevacizumab-naïve; n=30) or with bevacizumab continuation (cohort B, n=30). Dual primary endpoints including overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival at either 12 (OS-12; cohort A) or six months (OS-6; cohort B) were assessed per cohort relative to historical benchmarks. Paired paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tumor samples were assessed for immunologic biomarkers by immunohistochemistry using digital quantification and Co-Detection-by-InDEXing (CODEX).

Results: Study therapy was well tolerated with most toxicities being grade ≤ 3. For cohort B, the primary endpoint of OS-6 was achieved (57%), however survival was not improved for cohort A patients. The ORR was 3.3% and 6.7% for cohorts A and B, respectively. CODEX analysis of paired tumor samples from 5 patients revealed an increase of activated T cells in the tumor microenvironment after study therapy.

Conclusions: Compared to historical controls, re-irradiation plus pembrolizumab appeared to improve survival among bevacizumab-refractory patients but not among bevacizumab-naïve patients. CODEX revealed evidence of intratumoral infiltration of activated immune effector cells. A randomized, properly controlled trial of PD-1 blockade plus re-irradiation is warranted to further evaluate this regimen for bevacizumab refractory patients, but alternative approaches are needed for bevacizumab-naïve patients.