Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer without lymphatic invasion after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Menée en Corée à partir de données 2012-2019 portant sur 2 284 patients atteints d'un cancer de l'estomac de stade précoce traité par chirurgie endoscopique, cette étude analyse l'intérêt d'une chirurgie supplémentaire chez les patients ne présentant pas d'envahissement ganglionnaire, puis identifie les facteurs de risque de métastase ganglionnaire

European Journal of Surgical Oncology, sous presse, 2021, résumé

Résumé en anglais

Background: Lymphatic invasion (LI) is a potent risk factor for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early gastric cancer (EGC) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, there are also other risk factors for LNM. Hence, to identify the need for additional surgery in some case of EGC without LI, the present study aimed to identify the risk factors for LNM in patients with EGC without LI.

Methods: Data from 2284 patients diagnosed with EGC who underwent curative surgery at National Cancer Center in Korea from January 2012 to May 2019 were collected. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients with EGC without LI were compared on the basis of LNM status.

Results: There were 339 (17.1%) and 1648 (82.9%) patients with and without LI respectively. Among these patients with and without LI, 118 (34.8%) and 91 (5.5%) patients presented with LNM, respectively. In patients with EGC without LI, tumor size larger than 3 cm (OR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.22–3.68; p = 0.007), submucosal invasion (OR = 4.14, 95% CI = 2.57–6.65; p < 0.001), and undifferentiated histologic type (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.45–3.76; p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for LNM. Rates of LNM in patients meeting absolute, expanded, and beyond expanded criteria without LI were 0%, 1.5% (OR = 3.27, 95% CI = 0.18–59.41; p = 0.423), and 7.3% respectively. When the expanded criteria were divided into four subtypes patients with EGC, without LI within each subtype did not show significant risk of incidence of LNM compared to the absolute criteria.

Conclusions: The current expanded criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) are tolerable in cases without LI, even though minimal risk LNM exists. Therefore, additional surgery may not be needed for patients meeting expanded criteria for ER.